It is very inspiring to look at KM approaches from other cultures, especially when they include concepts hardly known in the western world. These differing concepts may be expressed by looking at KM from a different angle, influenced by the individuals view on our world which – of course – is very much related to their cultural background. And sometimes, they are expressed by using words implying concepts that might be alien to us.
A different perspective on KM…
Md Santo, founder of the Mobee Knowledge Management CoP on NING, developed an approach to Knowledge Management based on an analogy with the human body. With a (as he referred to it) “provoking statement” in the MKM CoP forum, he states that ->
“After Singularity between Human Mind and Technology reaching its peak (in 2012 ?), it will be the “Jump Time” for us to make “Great Turning” from the BRAIN as locus of Mind to the DNA as locus of Consciousness and Value”.
Although I have to confess that I still don’t grasp the connections between -> & -> the attributes of the universe dynamic, the human body, human behaviour, and KM Entities:
* structure – anatomy – consciousness and value (Bahasa: Kehendak) – km standards
* function – physiology – human senses (Bahasa: Rasa) – km tools
* process – metabolism – mind (Bahasa: Akal) – km process frameworks
… I like Md Santo’s definition of the KM Entity:
* Knowledge (Management) is the staging of Human Enlightment Process.
* The process is to managing the transformation of Information content into Knowledge and beyond.
* The Goals are towards Learning, Growth and Innovation.
* The management should leveraged by KM Standards, KM Tools and Process Framework
(Md Santo, EPISTEMOLOGY OF KNOWLEDGE MANAGEMENT DERIVED FROM ANALOGY WITH HUMAN BODY GENOME MANAGEMENT.pdf)
KM in other words…
Md Santo also gives the Indonesian (Bahasa Indonesia) expressions in his graphs and I am wondering if there are particular (culture-related) connotations to them that would not become apparent when using the English expressions only.
In their introduction to the The Knowledge Forum 2008 of the Knowledge Management Society of Japan (KMSJ), the KMSJ President Matsutaro Morita
and the Forum President Norio Agata recognized the creation of Chi as increasingly important as companies focus on knowledge and intellectual capital management: “We should focus our research effort on international standardization of methodology for evaluation and comparison of Creation of Chi.”
Chi is often translated as an energy flow forming part of any living thing. With regards to KM, Agata and Morita refer to the creation of Chi as an approach to utilizing “people’s knowledge and wisdom productively within a organization”.
Another Asian concept that has been adopted by KM practitioners is Ba: Ba is a context which has a meaning and, according to Nonaka, can be seen as a shared space of emerging relationships.
Nonaka defined four different types of Ba: -> Originating Ba, Interacting Ba, Cyber Ba, and Exercising Ba. From this principle, an approach for the transformation of the workplace has been derived: The “happy workplace“, being -> “a Ba that fosters knowledge creation and innovation in the organization”. This approach takes Knowledge Management to a next level; it goes beyond IT infrastructure and management principles and even beyond the creation of intellectual capital and its direct impact on the share holder value. It focuses on “management and leadership to seek satisfaction at the workplace, and the good of society.” (ibid.)
At the APQC website, however, we are back to the truly western view of Ba as they say it helps organizations to “achieve key goals such as accelerating innovation and reducing costs and cycle times associated with product development”. Anyway, there is a presentation on Ba for free download you shouldn’t miss.